300mm Semiconductor Manufacturing in NY - Senior Technician Specialist bei IBM: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
10. Apr. 2009
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

This is one of the most advanced fully automated semiconductor facilities in the world. The facility is located in the Hudson Valley and is only an hour from New York City. The facility is close to major highways, railroads and airports offering access to a variey of recreational interest. Working here allows a unique opportunity to work in a multi national, multi company aliance collaborative atmosphere with opportunities to work on several cuttin edge technologies and in developing future product geometries. There are weekly seminars and presentations on various subjects regarding current technological breakthru's and other subjects of iterest within the engineering community. There are ample opportunities for professinal networking.

Kontras

This is a 24 x 7 x 365 manufacturing operation. Because of recent downsizing some services such as education have been cut. In addition at times it is difficult finding the right person to assist with issues. There is a mix of production and development wip in the line which can cause some comtention with tool time for development work. The overall atmosphere is that of a sense of urgency which at times can adversely affect personal life balance. Mentoring is encouraged but is often hard to arrange due to work constraints and committments. The engineering community is located in large cube farms.

Mehr Bewertungen zu IBM entdecken

5.0
8. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Supportive management, flexibility, benefits, very smart peers

Kontras

Limited location options to work in depending on department

4.0
26. Aug. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Kontras

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
Reaktion von IBM
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle