Was fabulous... Can be fabulous again - Manager bei LinkedIn: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
9. März 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Was amazing up until about Jan 2023. Culture was off the charts. Everyone is super nice, caring and collaborative. Employees want to see each other win. It's not just about individual achievement. WLB is pretty good.

Kontras

Around Jan 2023, it started shifting, primarily due to the waves of layoffs that have been hitting since then. The layoffs have taken a huge toll on the morale at the company, and the energy has shifted to be one that's more paranoid, less of a feeling of security (which is never conducive to the highest levels of productivity so it's a vicious cycle). LI has also back peddled on their remote work policy. For the past couple years they touted how much they trusted their employees, that research is showing how productivity is just as strong for remote workers, and that everyone could choose where they wanted to work from. Now they're forcing everyone to be in the office several days per week - despite the research showing productivity is just as high at home.

Mehr Bewertungen zu LinkedIn entdecken

5.0
19. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

great company with amazing people involved

Kontras

little too small to have industry wide research breakthroughs

3.0
21. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Kontras

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle