If Hypocrisy Were A Company - Senior Manager bei LinkedIn: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
23. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-"Mouse Utopia" with unlimited snacks and comforts -Benefits were good but these were slowly drained -Some smart and hard workers, especially mid-level engineers

Kontras

-Advertises inclusive workplaces, work-life balance, and several other corporate virtue signals on its platform yet breaches them egregiously internally -Has minions that monitor negative reviews of the company (likely reading this) to try to prevent leaks of its despicable culture -On culture: one of the most passive-aggressive, sycophantic ones you will ever experience -Exemplifies everything disordered about the Professional Managerial Class and HR committees -Quickly flipped their fickle "inclusion" policies as soon as their AI arms race took hold and pushed away their ESG corporate symbology -Ran an offshoring campaign to India under the nose of some but obvious to others, with swaths of middle management leaving starting in 2023 -"Flattening orgs" = creating ambiguous incentive and promotion structures so the politicking can politic even more -After all the re-orgs, what was left of management was largely a sociopath's team

Mehr Bewertungen zu LinkedIn entdecken

5.0
7. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Benefits, work culture, people, offices

Kontras

Roles are dependent on the ROI of the job & location, as the latest layoffs

3.0
21. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Kontras

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle