The interview process was well structured and respectful. Conversations were substantive and focused on judgment, problem-solving, and how one thinks through complex situations, rather than purely technical questions or hypotheticals. Interviewers were well prepared, engaged, and open, and the discussions felt more like a two-way exchange than an interrogation. There was also transparency around expectations, team dynamics, and how the role fits within a broader, matrixed organisation. The process moved at a reasonable pace and communication was clear throughout. Overall, it felt like an interview process designed to assess real fit and long-term contribution, rather than just ticking boxes.

The interview process was extensive, comprising three distinct rounds wherein I engaged in discussions with three different interviewers. This comprehensive approach provided a thorough assessment of my qualifications and suitability for the role.