Scientist - Vaccine Development - Scientist bei Merck: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
8. Mai 2018
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Smart people, exciting and meaningful work, good experience in the pharmaceutical industry, stability (depending on the department), nice facilities (West Point)

Kontras

Low Compensation for the industry, middle management not properly trained to lead teams, constant restructuring and reorganization, limited pipeline, bureaucratic organization with lots of politics between and within departments, hard to advance and move up, cutthroat and noninclusive culture. There are much better pharma companies who treat their employees better and offer far better opportunities.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Merck entdecken

5.0
3. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

End of the year shutdown which includes paid time off

Kontras

The con for me at the time was that I had to relocate which wasn’t possible

4.0
2. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Kontras

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle