QA specialist, Project Scientist, Regulatory affairs specialist, equipment validation - Research Scientist bei Merck: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
19. Jan. 2018
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

High level of specialisation, opportunities for development, high quality workforce, good benefits

Kontras

Reorganizations, layoffs, unstable environment, diminishing value of resources , bad return on investment

Mehr Bewertungen zu Merck entdecken

5.0
9. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pension plan is great with high proportion

Kontras

Slow promotion and too much meetings

4.0
2. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Kontras

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle