High chances of getting stuck in Gtech with a bad team - Programmatic Specialist bei Google: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
27. Sept. 2022
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Total Benefits, Food, Brand and Perks

Kontras

*Applicable to Gcare GTech Google India Roles If you have some good credentials, and brand names, they may hire you, even if you don’t have a lot of digital marketing experience. Have friends who wonder why were they hired in the first place. Gcare work involves supporting well mature clients and non agency hires struggle to match up to their colleagues who have worked for 6-7 years in ads agencies. While expectations are to brew magic (i.e sell) from the get go, with very little support or handholding or what is kindly called in today’s time as allyship. Work pressure is intense in a few teams. Teammates are too tied up with their work to have spare time to collaborate and support each other. An unsaid unhealthy competition exists due to survival fear or scarce promotion. Seems like some of them brought along the toxic agency culture with them. Maybe that is hindering collaboration. Since they were or are not helped by others, they won’t help anyone else. And as with other Google orgs, the Product Managers are often too busy to provide knowledge support of the products they build, in time. They build products, any client specific solutioning advice is out of bounds. So expect figuring everything out on your own. And as with other Google orgs, expect working with sales and account managers, where the credit is shared and the risk is all yours. Account managers are too lazy and offload their work and unrealistic expectations. Some of them lack efficient planning and cause last minute fire drills. So expect the pressure of higher sales targets and associated pitch and research work falling solely on you. Even though you didn’t sign up for a sales job, it ends up being one. So be ready to devise cunning ways to upsell more and more everyday to each account. Wait wasn’t Google’s motto Don’t be evil? Managers are more like people managers, and some lack the expertise or the leadership to unblock employees, create an efficient framework for managing team operations. Not all of them are Googly. Some of the new hire managers who have joined from media or agency overstep work and personal life boundaries. Not too flexible with job locations and remote work. Be ready to move to Hyderabad. (Although some flexibility has emerged, but still not as flexible as its tech industry peers). Hybrid work - 3 days in office per week is an implicit expectation. Other orgs in Google don’t have a very favourable opinion of the G Tech org. The way out is not easy. Internal mobility to a different Google org is difficult as many people try for it. Externally one can try in similar customer success, professional service roles in 4-5 reputed product firms in this space in India. Industry brand management and digital marketing roles will entail a 25% - 50% paycut on total compensation, and are few in number anyway. Going to an agency after Google probably sounds like a nightmare. Long story short - Look, it’s a great brand to say no to, but do your research, ask these hard questions to hiring team. If you’re getting in easy, there’s a catch.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Google entdecken

5.0
4. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good teammates, benefits and pay

Kontras

Everyone is forced to AI even if your projects have nothing to do with it.

4.0
21. Juni 2013
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

1) Food, food, food. 15+ cafes on main campus (MTV) alone. Mini-kitchens, snacks, drinks, free breakfast/lunch/dinner, all day, errr'day. 2) Benefits/perks. Free 24:7 gym access (on MTV campus). Free (self service) laundry (washer/dryer) available. Bowling alley. Volley ball pit. Custom-built and exclusive employee use only outdoor sport park (MTV). Free health/fitness assessments. Dog-friendly. Etc. etc. etc. 3) Compensation. In ~2010 or 2011, Google updated its compensation packages so that they were more competitive. 4) For the size of the organization (30K+), it has remained relatively innovative, nimble, and fast-paced and open with communication but, that is definitely changing (for the worse). 5) With so many departments, focus areas, and products, *in theory*, you should have plenty of opportunity to grow your career (horizontally or vertically). In practice, not true. 6) You get to work with some of the brightest, most innovative and hard-working/diligent minds in the industry. There's a "con" to that, too (see below).

Kontras

1) Work/life balance. What balance? All those perks and benefits are an illusion. They keep you at work and they help you to be more productive. I've never met anybody at Google who actually time off on weekends or on vacations. You may not hear management say, "You have to work on weekends/vacations" but, they set the culture by doing so - and it inevitably trickles down. I don't know if Google inadvertently hires the work-a-holics or if they create work-a-holics in us. Regardless, I have seen way too many of the following: marriages fall apart, colleagues choosing work and projects over family, colleagues getting physically sick and ill because of stress, colleagues crying while at work because of the stress, colleagues shooting out emails at midnight, 1am, 2am, 3am. It is absolutely ridiculous and something needs to change. 2) Poor management. I think the issue is that, a majority of people love Google because they get to work on interesting technical problems - and these are the people that see little value in learning how to develop emotional intelligence. Perhaps they enjoy technical problems because people are too "difficult." People are promoted into management positions - not because they actually know how to lead/manage, but because they happen to be smart or because there is no other path to grow into. So there is a layer of intelligent individuals who are horrible managers and leaders. Yet, there is no value system to actually do anything about that because "emotional intelligence" or "adaptive leadership" are not taken seriously. 3) Jerks. Sure, there are a lot of brilliant people - but, sadly, there are also a lot of jerks (and, many times, they are one and the same). Years ago, that wasn't the case. I don't know if the pool of candidates is getting smaller, or maybe all the folks with great personalities cashed out and left, or maybe people are getting burned out and it's wearing on their personality and patience. I've heard stories of managers straight-up cussing out their employees and intimidating/scaring their employees into compliance. 4) It's a giant company now and, inevitably, it has become slower moving and is now layered with process and bureaucracy. So many political battles, empire building, territory grabbing. Google says, "Don't be evil." But, that practice doesn't seem to be put into place when it comes to internal practices. :(

3865
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle