It's only a job... - Employee bei General Atomics: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
20. Aug. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I earn money although it's much less than what I made 10 years ago doing the same job. Also, I have medical insurance.

Kontras

Everything pretty much sucks at GA-ASI. Have seen a lot of good people give up and leave because they got fed up with the BS; i.e. the good ole boy system run by former military staff who have no people skills. Management looks the other way because they only care that the job gets done, executive level management puts on a show with their Service Awards but the next minute they can't acknowledge underlings who work for them?!?! Expected to 'play well with others' who are disrespectful, condescending and who abuse their power. No one to turn to for work place issues; HR will throw you under the bus as will your very own manager. Archaic processes that should have been updated years ago. Very disappointed with this company in general, but I need medical coverage and an income to survive.

Mehr Bewertungen zu General Atomics entdecken

5.0
8. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very good work life balance

Kontras

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
11. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Kontras

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle