Forced RTO - Principal Research Software Engineer bei Genentech: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
5. Aug. 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It is enjoyable to work at the cutting edge of science and innovation. I still have a job and have not been laid off.

Kontras

The past 3 years with WFH has been transformative to the organization, but for some reason, they are attempting to drag the company back into the 1980s like the internet doesn't exist. C-level and VP-level executives are obsessed with RTO at the SSF site, even for people that work in globally distributed teams. They have begun to count badge swipes to punish employees that don't comply to set an example. Yearly cost of living raises are not keeping up with inflation and most employees have lost somewhere in the range of 10-15% in spending power over the past 3 years. HR will claim that yearly cost of living raises are given to keep up with the cost of labor, but words like these don't pay for rent, food, or energy costs that are spiraling in the Bay Area. The lab scientists have seen massive budget cuts this year and are forced to scrounge and negotiate with all of their suppliers to have reagents, materials, and basic lab supplies to perform their experiments or risk missing their goals. DEI efforts are talked about like things are going great, but the newly formed gCS department leadership team was just filled entirely with middle-aged white men.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Genentech entdecken

5.0
27. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Patient-centric company. great culture & benefits

Kontras

Not always clear how promotions are awarded.

2.0
19. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The work is meaningful and overall the company vision aligns with my goals

Kontras

QA management has become inept. None of the leadership (aside from maybe one or two) truly understand the nuances of our site and jobs. They refuse to pay you more due to "budget" reasons but won't provide much information, they claim to be transparent but will make decisions behind your back and not communicate them, even if they impact you and/or your job. Leadership doesn't listen to feedback and gets defensive if you even try to give any. It honestly has become a game of politics only in QA and that's not really building any real quality culture.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle