First round was screening call virtual where I was asked regarding my background etc Post that I had a call with an onsite sr guy who asked me regarding my work profile and how I handle scenarios and what all tools I have worked on and what is my approach to testing Then after sharing my details with the team I was given an assignment with code and had to submit it on a deadline.

Initial interview went well. I received all the info I needed about the company and felt that the role might have not been good for me as such but that Hudl would be willing to support me in achieving my career progression. I was requested to do an assessment within a week. This has to be done in playwright but any other tool can be used. I submitted the assessment in 5 days and was told I would hear back in 2 days. After 2 days I only heard that they were still chasing the people to review it. A week after i finally heard back that I had passed to the next round. (During this time HR kept in touch apologising for the delay). So it took 1.5 weeks to review something they had requested. I find this a bit disrespectful in the sense … if they don’t have the employers willing to review the code they request then maybe the process is going wrong and they should change for a live in code type interview. By the time I heard back that I had passed to the next round I had already received offers so I decided to decline to continue. It’s a shame because Hudl was one of my favourite companies i was interviewing for but I couldn’t risk losing the other offers.