Weak Leadership and Toxic Expectations - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei eGENTIC: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
20. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Recognition Depends on Pleasing Management.

Kontras

Management style feels very performative rather than effective. The MD frequently messages the team after working hours, seemingly to project a “hardworking” image, but it comes across more as poor time management and lack of boundaries. Leadership presence is also lacking — customer visits often feel like accompanying an inexperienced junior rather than being guided by a confident leader. There is also an unrealistic expectation of zero mistakes from staff, which creates unnecessary pressure and tension. This is a workplace run by humans, not machines. A stronger balance of professionalism, communication, and people management would greatly improve the environment.

Mehr Bewertungen zu eGENTIC entdecken

2.0
19. Aug. 2016
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexibler Arbeitsplan Von zu Hause aus arbeiten

Kontras

Niedriglohn Geringe Werbemöglichkeiten Das Management verwendet mündlich das Alter als Grundlage für die Bezahlung

1.0
13. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Cannot think of anything over the last 3 years

Kontras

APAC leadership lacks transparency, strategic consistency, and accountability Culture is highly top-down, with excessive power concentrated locally Employees may feel unsafe openly voicing concerns or challenging decisions Poor communication from leadership has repeatedly damaged morale Unrealistic workload expectations without sufficient structural support Decision-making is often inconsistent, with unclear ownership and shifting expectations Internal politics can outweigh performance and merit Recent employee appraisal process was particularly disappointing: what was presented as a fair and transparent scoring framework appeared, in practice, to be heavily influenced by management’s preferred payout decisions rather than genuine employee performance or contribution Final appraisal outcomes often felt predetermined based on budget or leadership(local) preference, rather than reflecting who truly deserved stronger recognition Local management has reportedly deflected responsibility by attributing payout decisions entirely to HQ, creating confusion while avoiding accountability for local advocacy This has led to growing employee distrust in both the appraisal system and leadership integrity High-performing employees may feel undervalued, especially when compensation and recognition seem disconnected from actual results Lack of effective leadership checks and balances further amplifies these issues

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle