Good place to work - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Veeam Software: Mitarbeiterbewertung

5.0
7. Aug. 2023
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Enthusiastic and nice colleagues - Challenging and diverse work - Good package

Kontras

- Communication between various teams/stakeholders (due to rapid growth)

avatar
Reaktion von Veeam Software
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share about your experiences with us. We're glad to hear that you find our workplace positive, filled with enthusiastic colleagues, challenging tasks, and a rewarding package. Our commitment to fostering a dynamic and diverse work environment is a cornerstone of our company culture. We appreciate your constructive feedback about communication challenges stemming from our rapid growth. As we continue to expand, we understand the importance of seamless collaboration between teams and stakeholders. We are actively working on enhancing our communication processes to ensure that all aspects of our organization align effectively, through Pulse Surveys and our annual Veeam Voice survey.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Veeam Software entdecken

5.0
4. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Kontras

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

2.0
3. Feb. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Kontras

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

7
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle