Veeam Review - Sowftware Developer bei Veeam Software: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
2. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salary Relocation possibilities VM/Cloud technologies experience

Kontras

Poor communication Outdated techinoliges Overtimes culture

avatar
Reaktion von Veeam Software
3w
Thank you for sharing your experience and for the time you spent with us in Berlin. We're glad the compensation, relocation opportunities, and hands-on exposure to VM and cloud technologies were valuable parts of your journey. We're sorry to hear about the communication gaps and overtime pressure. These are areas we're actively working to improve, and your feedback helps us understand where to focus. We wish you all the best in your next role.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Veeam Software entdecken

5.0
4. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Kontras

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

2.0
3. Feb. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Kontras

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

6
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle