good for first timers - Quality Analyst bei Twin Rivers Technologies: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
29. Jan. 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

if your looking for a good place to work and get your starting experience, this is the place to be. the hire newcomers relatively easy, so long as you have some valid experience and a similar degree. the work pace is fast or slow, so you'll have some side time to work on any side projects you have. bosses are friendly, and you'll get training from a variety of people on your team.

Kontras

The building location is old, so the atmosphere may seem musty, probably not the best for someone with asthma. the coworkers not on your team are old and experienced (this is not bad for me), but if you get offended really easily I don't think you'll get along very well with the other teams in the building.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Twin Rivers Technologies entdecken

5.0
21. Okt. 2020
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

A very positive experience there.

Kontras

Not any specific cons - not a good question.

1.0
29. Okt. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Schedule is 12 hour shifts, alternating between four and three days a week. - Great resume builder job. - The people are nice; I met one of my best friend there, and the tank operators were all very friendly with me.

Kontras

- Coworkers/managers/leaders largely apathetic, no initiative shown, lack of caring. - Laziness was always rewarded (could be a pro for some people), "Why would I do the work for that? I won't be punished" was verbatim what many people said, and was a common mindset. - Most managers were afraid of confrontation, breeding complacency among the team. - You are often expected to work in unsafe conditions. OSHA was contacted four different times during my two year tenure. - Communication from managers is very well known to be inefficient at best, negligent at worse. - Noncompetitive pay. You could make just as much being a mover. - Team's chemistry knowledge was suboptimal; many were clueless, leaving many projects to more experienced people (I felt taken advantage of). This was not the team's fault at all, but a problem with training and job requirements (which goes back to noncompetitive pay). - Mountains of bureaucracy and empty promises. - They only care if you quit.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle