Stable but need to improve - Senior Software Engineer bei Trimble: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
4. Mai 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Mostly gentle and great people. Work life balance. A lot of experts. Great office and wide parking space.

Kontras

-Poor benefits - Only health & life insurance -Poor HR - Too long hiring process(6 months), useless process (t-time, typical process/documents), poor learning courses. -Poor Management - Wasted too much money on other stuff and no employee support. Tried to do something, but none of them was useful, and kept doing them. -Poor salary - 8 years senior software engineer 95K. No bonus until seniors. -The average age is about 50 years old. No young people. Young people find it hard to mingle with the old. After 2 years, all leave due to the poor salary and poor royalty. -No carrier opportunities. (hard to move to other teams)

Mehr Bewertungen zu Trimble entdecken

5.0
27. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

great company with great people around.

Kontras

so far it has been very well

1.0
3. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

There are not any pros to working for Trimble at this time. Especially if you reside in the US. The current CPO thinks we cost too much and AI can do it.

Kontras

Severe Leadership Instability: Navigating four different managers in under a year makes it impossible to maintain consistent alignment on goals, strategy, or expectations. You are constantly adapting to shifting management priorities rather than executing a stable product vision. "Sink or Swim" Culture: Onboarding is virtually non-existent, particularly for highly complex legacy platforms. There is a severe lack of role advocacy and functional coaching. When explicit requests for training are made, they are met with a generalized mandate to "get it done" without providing the necessary executive backing or cross-functional support. The "Generalist" Efficiency Trap: There is intense corporate pressure for product leaders to operate as generic generalists across highly technical, domain-specific platforms. This dilutes subject matter expertise and slows execution. Shifting Goalposts: Performance baselines are inconsistent. You can receive formal documentation from one manager stating you have made "considerable progress on all goals," only to have the organization introduce vast, entirely uncommunicated role metrics for the first time via sudden administrative performance processes. Systemic failures caused by legacy processes are frequently misattributed to individual execution.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle