I'd avoid it in every possible way - Matchmaker bei Tawkify: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
19. Feb. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Remote work, great co-workers trauma bonded by comically terrible leadership

Kontras

gaslighting, being paid below a living wage, having to work with clients who were sold something you can't deliver on. Worked here for multiple years. The time as an Independent Contractor was great, but then they switched us to employees and everything got terrible. What it seems like is they're hemorrhaging money and doing everything they can to stay afloat, including paying matchmakers below a living wage, taking on clients fully knowing they have no one to set them up on dates with. It's in the contract that we're not allowed to write Glassdoor reviews, so that should give you some idea.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Tawkify entdecken

5.0
18. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

No two days look exactly the same: you talk with different people, learn about their personalities, and help them find meaningful connections. Coworkers are friendly and happy to serve as your sounding board when you want to discuss ideas or need another perspective. There's good communication across the team, and expectations are usually clear. I also appreciate the flexibility in how the work gets done. The pay and benefits are quite attractive.

Kontras

Weekend availability is needed at times.

2.0
22. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Amazing team, and great clients but service is sub par

Kontras

Tawkify was a great company to work for, but about two years ago the business began shifting toward a more scaled and outsourced operating model. Key functions such as screening and date coordination were moved offshore, and matchmaker caseloads increased from roughly 20–25 clients to more than 80 clients each. Unfortunately, that was not the experience I originally signed up for. The focus seemed to shift from personalized matchmaking to a high-volume, production-oriented model. In my opinion, the quality of service declined as matchmakers were expected to manage significantly more clients with fewer resources and less individualized attention. As a result, many of the company's strongest and most experienced matchmakers chose to leave. While the company may have improved operational efficiency, I believe the client experience and overall quality of matchmaking suffered, making it difficult to justify the premium price point.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle