Amazing Environment. Amazing growth potential. Amazing Benefits. Spotty Management. - Computer Operator bei Synergent: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
7. Aug. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Synergent offers an excellent benefits package, and the wages seem very fair. The company is continuing to grow each year, and each year is adding new employees. The time off policy is more than fair, and the current staff is highly knowledgeable in their departments.

Kontras

Each department is micromanaged by a manager, team lead, and backup team lead, which leads to a "hydra effect" of departments not working well with each other due to differing goals or deadlines. Communication between departments is muddled, at best. Depending on which department you work for can mean a greater impact on an employee's personal life. Although the company is experiencing major growth, the company does not seem to have an understanding on how to accomodate the growth.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Synergent entdecken

5.0
29. Jan. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good benefits, small enough company where your opinion matters and they genuinely care about their employees.

Kontras

Financial services can be boring at times

1.0
29. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

• Supportive Management: My Direct Manager (the AVP of HR) was professional and supportive, providing one of the few positive aspects of my time there. • Initial Executive Interaction: The first interview involving the CFO/EVP and Chief Growth Officer was initially engaging, though the experience changed significantly once the offer and onboarding began.

Kontras

As an HR professional with 15 years of experience, I have never encountered such a significant gap between what is promised during an interview and the reality of the work environment. I resigned after one month due to systemic inconsistencies. 1. Conflicting Expectations & Scheduling "Bait-and-Switch": • The position was posted as being in the office 5 days a week. However, during the interview, I was explicitly told by a VP and an AVP that I would only need to be in the office 2 days a week. • Once I started, the expectations changed again. I learned that the HR team is the only team in the entire company without flexibility, required to be in the office 4–5 days a week while other departments enjoy hybrid options. There are huge, uncoordinated swings in expectations between different teams. • Additionally, core hours (8:00 AM – 5:00 PM) were never disclosed during the offer or onboarding, which is critical information for anyone with a long commute. 2. Compensation Inequity and Misrepresentation: • Despite my seniority, the CFO/EVP offered the minimum vacation time and claimed it was non-negotiable for all new hires. This was demonstrably false; I discovered that peers and those lower on the org chart had successfully negotiated for more. This lack of transparency and failure to value experience felt like a direct slight to a seasoned professional. 3. Executive Disengagement: • The CFO/EVP (my manager’s manager) moved our scheduled one-on-one three times and failed to meet with me once during my 30 days. For an executive who was heavily involved in the recruitment process to be that unavailable for a new senior hire is highly unprofessional. 4. Poor Exit Handling: • When I resigned and offered a professional two-week notice to transition my work, the CFO/EVP and President chose to walk me out immediately. They only paid me for 1.5 weeks instead of the full notice period I was willing to work, which felt like a final lack of professional accountability.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle