This company does not care about it's employees. - Product Engineer bei Spansion: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
16. März 2009
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The group I worked with was great. The work was usually interesting, and I enjoyed the disappearing "AMD" culture. Generally at the level where work actually gets done, there are a lot of great people.

Kontras

They are willing to lay you off without any notice and no severance package, even violating the law. The new CEO, John Kispert, is as incompetent as he is heartless. The layoff stunt in parallel with executive pay increases was a PR nightmare that should never have happened, even just beyond the ethics. They have complete disregard for the welfare of employees. I would never recommend or work for this company again. After all, you could be next.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Spansion entdecken

5.0
29. März 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

good location team was solid

Kontras

none i can think of

3.0
15. Apr. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good place to work with lots of good people; laid back as most places in Austin are. Mature systems in a mature fab and everything is in full production mode. Lots of very intelligent, creative engineering talent here. Everybody there knows their job and do it exceptionally well. CEO did a remarkable job post bankruptcy especially keeping the company profitable.

Kontras

Echo what somebody else said about little to no opportunities for growth in management specifically. Every upper level manager has been there for several years making it difficult for anybody to take those positions. Aging work force although not sure if that's a bad thing. Bonuses were an interesting exercise in futility. There didn't seem to be much visibility to what exactly needed to be done to get them. Forced distribution for employee ranking (quarterly and annually), while a common thing for most companies, didn't make much sense for a company that already had an extremely lean work force. They've gutted so many employees that most of the "low performers" were really average performers that just got screwed by the idea that a company has to have 10-15% of the employees be ranked into the lowest performance tier.

2
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle