Analyst - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Selective Insurance: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
1. Aug. 2017
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Nice co-workers and work campus.

Kontras

Workload is untenable. Most managers are very unprofessional and disrespectful of their staff; treating them like lower class citizens. An overwhelming majority of people live locally, have known each other all their lives, and have never worked anywhere else. In addition, many of their spouses and family members also work there. This seems to fuel the formation of clicks, unequal treatment of employees, and disparate salaries and career development. What's more, there is no comprehension or appreciation for how other organizations do things, so a diverse view or dissenting opinion gets one targeted and treated as a troublemaker.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Selective Insurance entdecken

5.0
17. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Kontras

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
26. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Kontras

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle