The Hunger Games : Claims Edition - Anonymous Employee- Former Employee bei Security First Insurance: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
19. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Security First has a "handful" of good people, the office is very nice, there is plenty of parking, and there is a trail behind the office so you can walk, cry, and scream in private from all the continued stress of the job.

Kontras

MY experience at SFI was beyond disappointing. Communication between departments is ALWAYS inconsistent, and processes frequently change without adequate training. Employees are expected to adapt quickly to new procedures while still maintaining their extremely demanding workloads, as well as the extremely demanding workload they acquired from that underperforming employee - who, by the way, remains on the payroll.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Security First Insurance entdecken

5.0
16. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great strong company. Cares about their people. Good benefits

Kontras

None. It’s a great company that is growing.

1.0
23. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The people I worked and interacted with on a daily basis were great.

Kontras

The company promoted a strong work-life balance during the hiring process, but that promise quickly proved unrealistic in practice. Likewise, employees were led to believe that quality healthcare coverage would be company-paid, only to later experience benefit changes that required employees to pay substantially more for meaningful coverage. Another significant concern was the company's shift in expectations regarding remote work. Most staff was hired into fully remote positions, located throughout Florida and from out of state. After hiring based on those representations, the company began pushing for employees to work from its Ormond Beach office. For many commuting to Ormond Beach on a regular basis was simply not feasible. Expecting employees to uproot their lives, relocate their families, and absorb the associated costs after being hired as remote workers was unreasonable, particularly given the uncertainty surrounding the organization's long-term direction and staffing decisions. The workload was consistently heavy, and employees were often required to devote substantial time to administrative or minute tasks that added little value to case strategy. The expectations were often unrealistic and disconnected from the practical realities of managing a high-volume caseload. Overall, the environment lacked respect, trust, and appreciation for the contributions of staff.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle