SFARAN - difficult place to work - Contracts Manager bei Safran: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
5. Feb. 2009
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Safran is a very stable, government owned company. If you want a job that will always be there for you, then this is the place. Expectations are low, but along with the low risk from working for SAFRAN comes low reward. The salary is low and there is little room for improvement since this is throughout the different levels of management.

Kontras

Being government owned has created a lazy work atmosphere. Working for Safran in Toulosue allows for no work life balance. All of the Cadre (management) are expected to work 12 hours a day (minimum) and most of the time is spent making other people do their work so that you cannot get your work done. The management style is something unique, extremely paternal where only one person can make decisions throughout the company. Since only one person can make the decisions, no one else would dare make one. So the effect is that you have a bunch of $100k guys making $1 decisions. This is contrary to management in the real world, but this is France and not the real world.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Safran entdecken

5.0
1. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

People are treated very well at Safran. They might not be the highest paying Aerospace company in the USA, but they have great benefits, management, and people. And still, the pay is usually competitive.

Kontras

The headquarters are in France and therefore you need to be open to a different culture. Additionally, French and English are used sometimes in communications.

3.0
24. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Many learning opportunities for troubleshooting different types of avian generator control units. Opportunities to work with a variety of engineering departments including production, test, quality, and industrialization. Occasional overtime opportunities.

Kontras

High stress due to production deadlines, especially at the end of month. Miscommunications due to constant reprioritizing of needs. Difficult to move from short term (1 year+ only) contracts to full time positions.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle