Continuing downward spiral - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Rise Against Hunger: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
4. Okt. 2018
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great mission and history Great founder

Kontras

They claim to be people driven, and as a nonprofit with a humanitarian focus, you would expect this to be true, but it is not. Almost everyone that leaves is fired on the spot without notice or a PIP. Or if they have a PIP, it was merely a formality. They just let their 5th marketing person go in 2 years, and she was told on the spot and given 30 mins to pack her things and get out. This is the run of the mill. Their HR department does not know what they are doing as they constantly change how goals and performance reviews work, your performance review has no impact on your pay scale, and they don't take any time to check on employees. Instead, they spend their time together as a team laughing, joking, and showing up late. The executive team changes strategic strategy every 6 months, are not held accountable, and live in their own silos. They do not get along well, and when they ask and receive honest feedback from employees, they make a joke out of it by putting on a song and dance (literally). The Global Impact team, who works with the starving families and children, receive little to no support from the rest of the company and instead donor money is wasted on software that isn't utilized, sending the executive team to other countries for "strategic planning" where they just post pictures of the food and drink they are consuming, or wasted on half million dollar annual retreats where they provide no actual content or information but just try to have a kumbaya moment and act like they care.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Rise Against Hunger entdecken

5.0
11. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good organizational culture Payroll is good People are great to work with Great platform and cause

Kontras

Philanthropy can be great, but in the current state of things, things are tighter. Understandably. Really, nothing bad to say

1.0
9. Feb. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Remote-first workplace, benefits, retirement match program, good paid time off.

Kontras

Poor change management. Lack of strong leadership trickles into poor communication and mistrust. Staff feedback is collected but not acted upon. Consistent unkept promises to improve. High staff turnover: 3 different CEOs in 4 years, multiple C-suite changes, sudden department changes - all shared without transparency, all were said to be "planned" structural changes (claims directly rebuked by employees). Consistent negative feedback from implementing partners on how the relationship is handled. Diversity, equity and inclusion are said but not acted upon. CEO went on a "work trip" to Thailand with other office heads and produced no oral or written report on strategies, problems solved, new direction, or any other item that would justify that cost (poor financial practices). The few highly impactful programs were abruptly cut after confirming plans to continue which left partners in low-resource settings scrambling to choose which of their programs to cut and staff to keep. CEO was grandfathered into the role and he, himself, admitted he was "unqualified" and "had no vision" - it is difficult to feel safe on a boat with an incompetent captain. Salaries are disproportionately high for some C-suite executives compared to other similar sized orgs - evidence of poor financial distribution (see 990s). Leadership has low EQ. This org will p!ss on your leg and tell you it's raining then have an All Staff meeting full of soulless motivational quotes and celebration of outputs without a focus on impact. It's hard to watch an organization with such potential continue to focus on the charity mindset and forego true impact for fear of change.

3
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle