employer cover photo

Resilience Development Initiative

Ist dies Ihr Unternehmen?

Great Staff and Middle Management, Poor Directors - Program Officer bei Resilience Development Initiative: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
28. Feb. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Honestly, one of the best people i've worked with were the program teams and staff. - The middle managers (program, outreach, grant, finance, etc.) are probably the most competent people in the company. Covering for poor and emotional decision making from directors/owners. - Really love the staffs, would love to work with them again, in different circumstances. - A good place to get some international portfolio as a fresh grad, and go abroad to study.

Kontras

- No overtime, which is sus! - Doesn't provide social insurance, although they preach about social protection, smh! - Changes plans frequently, very spontanious strategic directions from owners/directors. - Demands POs to be 10yr experienced vets in consulting/research/networking without adequate support.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Resilience Development Initiative entdecken

4.0
23. Nov. 2023
Praktikant (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Everyone is really friendly and patient

Kontras

I don't really have any

3.0
21. Jan. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

A place that provides ample experience in substantive research and consulting, especially for fresh graduates looking into being out of unemployment. In this job, you will face the 'real world' of how consulting jobs work, especially when handling various clients. Colleagues are mostly gen-Z and work environment is adequate at providing motivation and resources for pursuing a career track or further studies.

Kontras

Relatively minimal care for employee welfare. (1) No dedicated HR that can regulate employee welfare and aspirations, no exit interviews and absolutely no attention to any employee feedback to the (single-source) upper management; (2) No board of advisors that supervises upper management; (3) Financial benefits are low compared with workload; (4) No insurance benefits (BPJS) provided by the organization; (5) Workload always surpasses provided work hours (high chance of overtime); (6) ... which happens because there is super high expectation and yet no attention to employee's workload by upper management (high chance of getting more workload on top of an already hectic one); (7) ... which leads to a rather toxic treatment from (again, single-source) upper management. There's a reason for a high turnover rate.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle