All the good reviews are by senior staff to try cover the genuine bad ones from peoples genuine awful work experiences. - Client Enquiry Manager bei Reeves: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
20. Apr. 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Socials are well fun, they actually put some tlc into arranging them and getting people together, some really fun times, some really really nice people.

Kontras

Sell you dreams but they dont exist, 2 staff literally very recently joined, both already gone, I imagine due to how underwhelming it must have felt once they started compared to the Hollywood style finance world dream they sold them. Other than providing you some paper work to read, no support whatsoever ever for doing your exams and there even so petty that if you do them then leave the company theyl get the money back off you, mind you most people leave not because they have found some incredible opportunity but just due to how sick they are of never being listened to. The running of the company is largely left to a handful of young, incompetent & egotistical people and shock horror that literally every review that’s not by a senior member of staff/manager is a really negative one. Maybe if you paid 10% of the type of attention that you do to the clients to your own staff who have got the company to where it is, you wouldn’t have to get senior members of staff to leave positive reviews to try cover up genuine bad work experiences. even better yet take some action to make your staff happier and listen to feedback instead of getting the managers on Glassdoor all day.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Reeves entdecken

4.0
8. Apr. 2022
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great company, good pay weekly

Kontras

None at this time, good

1.0
24. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pay was acceptable for some roles and the business could provide varied experience due to moving staff across departments. Some nice people.

Kontras

A deeply unhealthy workplace culture where inappropriate behaviour was too often tolerated and concerns did not appear to be taken seriously. Professional boundaries felt inconsistent, and conduct that would be unacceptable in many modern organisations could be brushed aside or normalised. Management standards felt weak and inconsistent. Favouritism appeared to matter more than competence, with some individuals protected while others were criticised or overlooked. Accountability did not seem to apply equally. There was little sense of fair progression, with roles and opportunities appearing to be handed out informally rather than through transparent internal processes. Hard work and capability did not always feel recognised. The environment could feel cliquey, exclusionary and at times demeaning, particularly if you did not fit the preferred social dynamic. Raising genuine concerns risked being labelled oversensitive rather than being supported. Overall, this was not a workplace that inspired trust, respect or confidence in leadership.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle