Good company - Intern bei Proceedit: Mitarbeiterbewertung

Working with the application unit was an excellent experience. Collaboration within that team was smooth, efficient, and well-coordinated, demonstrating that effective teamwork is achievable under the right leadership and communication practices. Additionally, the flexibility to take leave when needed was a positive aspect and was handled without major difficulty.

Management frequently makes decisions without consulting the relevant departments, which leads to avoidable inefficiencies and frustration across teams. There is also a consistent pattern of not acknowledging or accepting well-known and clearly identified issues, even when they are supported by facts. This creates an environment where problems persist rather than being constructively addressed. The CEO appears disengaged from employee concerns and overall workplace wellbeing. In addition, there is a noticeable lack of trust when it comes to payments, which raises serious concerns about reliability and transparency within the company. This is further reinforced by operational delays, such as the contract preparation process taking nearly a month, indicating inefficiency in administrative processes. Beyond these issues, there are significant communication breakdowns, particularly with the Director of Operations. There is an ongoing pattern of miscommunication, largely due to an unwillingness to listen to other team members. Decisions are often made unilaterally, without considering input from team members, resulting in disorganization and a lack of cohesion across operations. Overall, while there are a few positive aspects, the broader work environment is significantly impacted by issues related to communication, trust, and management practices.

On the positive side, working with the application unit was an excellent experience. Collaboration within that team was smooth, efficient, and well-coordinated, showing that effective teamwork is achievable within the organization under the right leadership and communication practices. The only other notable benefit was the flexibility to take leave when needed, which was handled without major difficulty.

Management frequently makes decisions without consulting the relevant departments, which leads to avoidable inefficiencies and frustration across teams. There is also a consistent pattern of not acknowledging or accepting well-known and clearly identified issues, even when they are supported by facts. This creates an environment where problems persist rather than being constructively addressed. The CEO appears disengaged from employee concerns and overall workplace wellbeing. In addition, there is a noticeable lack of trust when it comes to payments, which raises serious concerns about reliability and transparency within the company. Beyond these issues, there are significant communication breakdowns, particularly with the Head of Production. There is an ongoing pattern of miscommunication, largely due to an unwillingness to listen to others. Decisions are often made unilaterally, without considering input from team members, resulting in disorganization and a lack of cohesion across operations. Overall, these combined factors contribute to a challenging work environment where communication, trust, and effective leadership are lacking.