The ship lost it's captain... and the ships clerk took the helm - Systems Engineer bei PassiveLogic: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
9. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Troy (the leaving founder) was an incredibly brilliant leader! He had such clarity and understanding across all aspects of the company: from the customer, to the market, deep into the technology — and how it all unfolded into the future, and what a product roadmap looks like to solve for each of those things. He brought energy and direction to the company that is impossible to replace. He was imaginative, intense, and deeply committed to the mission. He could take a complex technical or organizational problem 5 layers deep, then thread it back up to a larger vision of solving market and planet-scale problems in a way that made people want to contribute.

Kontras

The new leadership isn’t competent. It has been 2 weeks, and I’ve seen enough. They are high on their own kool-aide, but aren’t listening to real concerns, and people are afraid to speak their minds. 

 Meanwhile the company direction and technology leadership has been thrown into disarray, and the new leadership doesn’t seem to have a clue what they are doing. Without Troy, the company now feels like a chaotic free-for-all. Worse, the new “leadership” is treating the team like the lack of direction is some kind of gift. It's bizarre. And it’s more insidious than that: the least informed people are now leading the most informed.

Mehr Bewertungen zu PassiveLogic entdecken

5.0
1. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

This is one of the most unique professional experiences I’ve had. The company was built around a very ambitious vision for physical AI, autonomy, and real-world systems. I came to work here for Troy Harvey's vision and principled approach to design. It was inspiring to work with him, and the mission drove me to work hard to achieve amazing things. I hope to continue to work with him in the future. What stood out most was the ability to connect hardware, software, AI, product, and customer value into one coherent direction. That kind of systems-level genius is rare. And his type of leadership uniquely collaborative leadership hard to come by. The work was meaningful because it felt like we were building something genuinely new, and we were doing it together as a team with a set of focused goals. The best part of the culture was the exposure to big ideas and high expectations. If you wanted to grow, learn, and be challenged, there was a lot of opportunity.

Kontras

The pace and expectations are intense. Communication could sometimes move quickly if you aren't paying attention because the company and the ideas were operating at a high level of complexity.

4.0
8. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

With Troy no longer in the CEO role, the company needs to prove that it can preserve what made it special. His absence will be felt, especially in the areas of vision, customer-market coherence, cross-org technical depth, and the ability to bring out the best in people. The company feels at best in search of direction and leadership without him. Troy was the kind of founder people join a company to work with. He had a rare ability to imagine what the world could become and then rally people around that future. He was a visionary systems thinker, but what made him especially effective was that he was also a team orchestrator. He could see how different people’s skills, instincts, and experiences fit together, often before they saw it themselves. That encouraged people do some of the best work of their careers. The company’s ambition came from that combination: huge technical vision, high standards, and a real belief in people. It created a culture where people were asked to stretch, but also where the work felt connected to a larger purpose.

Kontras

This isn’t con per se. I’ve read some of the (curious) complaints below. These are self describing: Troy didn’t suffer fools. He was incredibly open to discuss, collaborate, and mentor. Sometimes it was a paradigm shift you had invest intellectual rigor to fully understand. But once you got it 🤯. You were always given many chances — probably too many. But if you were lazy, or didn’t put the intellectual effort, he would move on or replace you. As it should be.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle