A publisher with an identity crisis - Editor bei PLOS: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
7. Sept. 2015
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salary is OK, but it comes at the expense of benefits and working environment.

Kontras

PLOS is unsure whether it is a publisher with a mission, or if it's a business pretending to have a broader purpose in order to drum up sales. The mission of Open Access is a worthy one, but a lot of publishers are doing it better and PLOS is quickly falling behind--many of its ideas are old-fashioned and naive. As a business, PLOS seems doomed as the entire organisation depends on PLOS ONE publishing 30,000+ articles a year, and if the impact factor drops, the model will quickly become unsustainable. PLOS's downplay of Impact Factor will prove to be what brings it down.

Mehr Bewertungen zu PLOS entdecken

5.0
26. Nov. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Ambitious and idealistic, so plenty of opportunities to contribute creatively.

Kontras

Ambitions are sometimes too high.

avatar
Reaktion von PLOS
5mo
Hello- thank you very much for taking the time to write your review. We read and appreciate each one. I think your comment on ambitions is very interesting and I'll be sharing with leadership. Take care!
4.0
23. Nov. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Co-workers are great and hard working.

Kontras

Opportunities for career advancement is limited on some teams.

avatar
Reaktion von PLOS
5mo
Thanks so much for your review. We appreciate your time and thoughtful feedback. We are currently working on career advancement initiatives and believe this should be a core focus as we go into 2026 and beyond.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle