Pros
Mostly remote friendly although if you are in Boston or can come to the office frequently, you're favored and likely moving up the ladder quicker.
Kontras
Despite the struggles that have persisted for years, leadership decisions haven't evolved to address the core issues. We've seen significant turnover—nearly 70% of the company has either been laid off or left voluntarily since 2022. Yet, those who remain in top leadership positions and the "OGs" are unaffected, even as performance falters. One of the more puzzling trends has been the focus on bringing in expensive executives while cutting vital employees to make room for them. For example, bringing in a CFO whose previous company struggled financially and legally has only added to the internal challenges. Complaints about this individual fall on deaf ears and employees have no option but to quit as a result. Promotions and bonuses for certain leadership roles, even in the face of unmet goals, reflect a lack of accountability that directly impacts morale. Promotions are based more on loyalty than performance. Individuals who haven’t delivered in their roles (CCO, COO, and others who have quickly risen to the top after failing at prior roles) are good examples. Specific titles were listed previously but as they obviously didn't like seeing that posted. This culture rewards playing internal politics over actual contribution. For those seeking meaningful growth and a company that values transparency, accountability, and merit, this is not the right fit. Many have tried to make a difference here and as long as the OGs remain employed here, you will fail.