Top dogs bark orders from the east coast; employees are about as valuable as office furniture. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei OTIS: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
3. Nov. 2011
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Wonderful co-workers and environment on the local level; good pay and benefits.

Kontras

Huge disconnect between the average worker and upper management; communication is terrible. Top management has no interest in employee input. Despite annual employee satisfaction surveys, required ethics training and the appearance of open communication, sadly it is all propoganda - the spirit of ethics, communication and employee value do not exist.

Mehr Bewertungen zu OTIS entdecken

5.0
12. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Real team work oriented. Feels very much being part of the company

Kontras

Needs juggling multiple jobs! A lot of travel involved. But great learning opportunities follow these.

1
1.0
6. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Otis is a well-known company with a strong brand name, established customers, and exposure to major commercial accounts. The role gives you real responsibility quickly, especially if you are managing a service territory with active customer issues, contract renewals, and operational escalations. The experience can build strong skills in account management, customer retention, field coordination, problem solving, and handling high-pressure customer situations. You get direct exposure to customers, technicians, operations, and leadership, which can be valuable if you want to grow in service, sales, or facilities-related industries

Kontras

The biggest issue is poor management. The branch has serious operational problems, but leadership does not seem to have a clear plan to fix them. Instead, the pressure gets pushed down to the account manager, who ends up dealing with angry customers, unresolved service issues, delayed communication, and internal problems they do not fully control. Management needs to take more ownership of the environment they are putting employees into. New hires should not be expected to clean up long-standing territory issues without proper training, realistic timelines, and real support. There is a big difference between holding people accountable and blaming them for problems that were already there. The leadership style feels reactive instead of organized. Problems are addressed after they become urgent, communication is inconsistent, and expectations can feel disconnected from what is actually happening in the field. This creates unnecessary pressure on employees and makes it harder to rebuild trust with customers. The role would be much more manageable if management provided stronger onboarding, clearer priorities, better internal coordination, and more realistic expectations. Without that, employees can end up stuck between frustrated customers and a leadership team that does not provide enough support to actually solve the root issues.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle