Program Analyst - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei NASA: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
5. Sept. 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Workforce is very smart. Most exciting mission of all government agencies, and very easy to be excited to come to work everyday.

Kontras

Headquarters is full of managers. Actual leaders have either retired, left, or were chased out. Used to enjoy a close-knit, family-friendly workplace but has grown cold and impersonal. Stealing credit, back-stabbing, and leaving a body count in the process will get you fast tracked to SES level. Due to bureaucracy and incompetent managers, NASA will be irrelevant once the commercial space and space tourism industries are established, but this is also because NASA's mission is carefully managed by the Congressional members who have a NASA center in their state. Therefore technology and innovation only goes at the speed that the workforces in Huntsville, Houston, and Goddard can handle. If your state has a more capable aerospace workforce but would have to compete with the states of those three centers, then you're just out of luck.

Mehr Bewertungen zu NASA entdecken

5.0
3. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

So many ways to engage yourself in the work Great hours, benefits

Kontras

Pay is rather low for Aerospace, even as an intern

1.0
4. Juli 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I have nothing good to say.

Kontras

If you are the victim of a crime or experience something illegal connected to NASA, do not blindly trust the internal process to protect you. In my experience, NASA has built relationships with local and federal agencies in a way that can push people right back into NASA’s own internal channels, including HR, the Inspector General, and Protective Services. The problem is that those offices may not have the authority, independence, or experience to properly handle serious criminal or legal issues. Once you are back inside that system, the priority can quickly become protecting the organization, managing liability, and controlling the narrative instead of protecting the person who was harmed. Victim intimidation is not just possible in that kind of environment. It should be expected. Once the organization is involved in controlling the process, the person reporting harm can end up pressured, isolated, discredited, or steered away from outside accountability. That is unacceptable. Victims should not be forced into a process where the organization involved gets to influence how the matter is handled. Internal offices are not a replacement for real legal protection, outside law enforcement, or independent legal counsel. If something illegal happens to you, talk to a lawyer first. Get independent advice. Have your attorney guide you through the appropriate outside agencies and legal channels. Do not assume NASA’s internal process is neutral, independent, or designed to protect you.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle