MongoDB, A Sinking Ship: Silent layoffs to avoid paying severance, rising mismanagement, unethical contracts - Software Engineer III bei MongoDB: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
15. Feb. 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Individual contributors there are usually quite friendly, so often your teammates will be fun and kind. They offers most of the fun perks that you would expect of a modern tech company.

Kontras

So many cons its hard to list: 1. Highly unethical contracts from MongoDB, i.e gut-wrenching contracts with inhumane organizations that I wish I could share more about. 2. Extremely poor management quality of MongoDB managers. It's only gotten worse over the past few years. From sexist managers, to nepotistic ones. Not to mention the ones who are highly unqualified to lead a team and become the yes-men for product at the expense of their team. Depending on your department you may actually get a really good manager, but because the hiring bar is all over the place in the past few years it's a huuge hit or miss. 3. Overspending in useless places: MongoDB spends ridiculous amounts of money on the stupidest perks, like expensive parties with champaign, having manicurist come in, etc. 4. No 401k match: I don't understand how you can spend money on the most unnecessary things, but not have any 401k matching. 5. Silent layoffs: MongoDB is actively having layoffs, without calling them layoffs. They recently announced they are "raising the bar". This is a way for MongoDB to layoff employees without paying severance, and it has very little to do with performance by itself. I believe middle management knows about this, and is being very discreet. 6. Unlimited PTO, i.e you don't actually get to go on vacation: In my time at MongoDB I was never allowed to properly take vacation time because the work was always so intense that you were discouraged from applying for weeks off. This is just a way to avoid paying out vacation time if employees don't use vacation. 7. Ridiculous workload (this might vary team to team): I've genuinely had days where I woke up and started coding right away, and then coded pretty much until I slept, and this happened so many times. You don't get any sort of thank you from management about this. In addition, so many employees are probably doing this kind of this but discouraged from talking about this in order to seem more productive so they can secretly match or exceed the absurd workload.

Mehr Bewertungen zu MongoDB entdecken

5.0
24. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Supportive people, a strong culture, and meaningful flexibility are the biggest positives. I've had the chance to work with thoughtful colleagues who care about doing good work and helping each other succeed. There are solid opportunities to learn, build relationships across teams, and contribute in a way that feels impactful.

Kontras

Workloads can be heavy during busy periods, and priorities can sometimes shift quickly (which is expected in growing companies)

1.0
9. Juli 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Unlimited PTO RSUs as part of compensation

Kontras

Toxic Culture Poor Leadership Little to no room for advancement Poor recognition of employees performance Professional Services Leaders have little to no previous leadership experience and have been promoted into their roles based on tenure. These leaders do not know how to strategize or enhance/grow a PS team. They recently laid off half of the team and didn’t realize there would be domino effects and people would quit, so now they are scrambling to backfill 2 roles. HR is not helpful when issues are formally reported. They do twice a year reviews where employees are graded on a scale of 1-4 (does not meets - consistently exceeds expectations). These are tied to annual salary increases. They don’t allow leaders to give out 3s and 4s to more than a couple of people…Even if you have high performers. They have a percentage for each department that must be met. Upper leadership is also clueless on how to successfully run a PS Org, and has been flip flopping on whether or not utilization should be measured and how to show a favorable margin. It’s unbelievable. One of their leadership principles is “intellectual honesty”, but when you ask direct questions related to ambiguous performance feedback or decisions made, your met with responses of “you shouldn’t really be asking that questions directly to that person, it put them on the spot”. Leadership principles are just words, they don’t actually matter here. Limited room for growth. Promotions happen once a year, and are tied to your performance rating. Multiple leaders are involved in the decision for promotion, not just your direct manager that knows the work you’ve done and your actual capabilities.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle