A poorly managed company - Direct Care Worker bei Merakey: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
11. März 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It is better than no job. And usually you can pick up extra shifts, because employee turnover is so high.

Kontras

The company seems to value satisfying state requirements more than patient safety, We had to take them on outing in the worst snowstorms of the season.(because the state wants it). Extremely low pay for the amount of work, and decisions that have to be made 8.25 hr. That is if you are in a permanent position. As needed positions pay considerably higher, but they expect you to be available all the time. There is no leadership for the individual houses, they do have someone they call a house coordinator , but you cannot call them to ask questions about how things should be done at this particular house. The on call coordinator is to be called for call offs only. A bad point if you are new. So if you make a decision and it is not the one they would have made you are in trouble. There is a benefit package, but the company pays no portion of the premiums. There is a union of some sort but it obviously is very ineffectual. When I have ask about things like workman's comp., vacations , and paid time off, no one seems to know anything.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Merakey entdecken

5.0
30. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Kontras

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
16. Dez. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Kontras

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle