Small newsroom with low morale, high turnover because of bad leadership - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei MIT Technology Review: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
14. Juni 2023
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Editorial colleagues are incredibly smart and talented. Reporters are deeply invested in their beats. Some editors are extraordinarily helpful and thoughtful. Small newsroom means people get to know each other.

Kontras

EIC and CEO are tightly focused on making money, which means editorial is forced to do quotas that are nearly impossible to reach. Those quotas are held as the reason why bonuses and/or professional growth can't be granted to people who work really hard, which means that morale is very low. Lots of lip service on DEI but the DEI Council has literally one POC on it and thinks that putting random seminars once a year achieves equity. EIC has no qualms about throwing reporters under the bus, and doesn't protect reporters, resorting to making lower managers take the hit if stories go awry. The quota system has led to high turnover, with management pushing minorities (POC, LGBTQ+ employees) out.

Mehr Bewertungen zu MIT Technology Review entdecken

5.0
2. Juli 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Competitive Salary, Remote environment, Great team, Good benefits, Easy interview

Kontras

None really, it can be hard to fully onboard.

2.0
2. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Supportive coworkers. Company culture allegedly prides ambition and curiosity.

Kontras

Horrid management. Constantly shifting priorities and inconsistent budget allocation.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle