Good people but incredibly overworked - Clinician II bei JCFS Chicago: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
14. Juni 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It depends what office you're in, but most of the people who work at JCFS are very good people. There are only a handful that I didn't really connect with.

Kontras

Low salary (although this is getting better), and a MOUNTAIN of unnecessary and redundant paperwork. The people who make the decisions aren't the ones affected by them. For example, a group of senior leadership decided that everyone should return to the office during quarantine. Not one of the people who made that decision needed to see people face to face to do their job. Same with the paperwork, there are dozens of forms for each client, and over-the-top documentation that most of the insurance companies we accept don't care about.

Mehr Bewertungen zu JCFS Chicago entdecken

5.0
19. Sept. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great mission, leadership and benefits. They care about their employees and their clients.

Kontras

Salaries competitive with similar agencies but still low.

2.0
2. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

1) Getting Jewish holidays off 2) Collaborative teachers, paras, and related service providers

Kontras

1) Lack of, underreported, or incorrectly altered documentation regarding student restraints. 2) Staff members are routinely placed in high-risk, volatile situations without adequate protection 3) Micromanagement of teacher communications with parents, which compromises the implementation of necessary safety interventions and harms relationships 3) Administrators exhibit unprofessional behaviors, including swearing, yelling, and a total lack of transparency 4) Discriminatory application of workplace rules and retaliation against staff who raise safety or educational concerns. 5) Chronic understaffing prevents students from receiving a high-quality education or necessary behavioral and emotional support: loss of at least 18 staff members—including teachers, paraprofessionals, and social workers—who were either suddenly fired or resigned on a monthly basis during the 25-26 school year. 6) Frequent, disruptive reassignment of both teachers and students between classrooms, which undermines instructional consistency 7) Absence of a standardized curriculum, structured lesson plans, or clear expectations regarding required instructional materials 8) Employees experience a severe lack of constructive support, mentoring, and professional guidance from direct supervisors. 9) Compensation is significantly lower than that of Chicago Public Schools. 10) The absence of a formal salary schedule prevents financial progression based on experience, licensure, or education level.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle