No stability, no consistency, not a serious workplace - Remote AI Trainer bei Invisible Technologies: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
17. Juni 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Remote work (although the lack of actual work diminishes this.) - Pay can be decent depending on where you live. - Flexibility in schedules (also impacted by lack of actual work.)

Kontras

- Poor project visibility – workers are unaware of available projects unless they are explicitly onboarded. - Outdated and misleading job marketplace, with mostly old postings and low wages. - Exploitative expectations – employees are expected to perform at a high level, but are treated as disposable contractors. - Lack of communication – no notice about task shortages or upcoming opportunities. - Unreliable workflow – clients can disappear for months with no updates or structure. - Ineffective communication system – Slack is the only method used to update workers. - Irrelevant leadership communication – monthly CEO emails don’t address core issues with the company, and contractors still remain without work. - Idle workforce – many remain contracted with no tasks to do. - No meritocracy – career advancement (QA or lead roles) depends on favoritism, not performance. - Inequitable work distribution – leads still get work even when regular agents have none.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Invisible Technologies entdecken

5.0
11. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Many brilliant motivated minds, some excellent technical elements, promising GTM, good compensation and benefits

Kontras

Need clearer focus and goal setting

1
1.0
27. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Payments are on time. - Flexible work (you can work according to your schedule).

Kontras

I personally wouldn't recommend this position or company to someone else. The projects end very abruptly, often without notice, leaving employees with significant uncertainty and anxiety during the project. Additionally, there's a lack of culture, partially because it's remote and also because of the nature of the projects. They really push for a kumbaya type of cohesion, but it's difficult to achieve given that projects end so abruptly and the turnover rate is so high. Secondly, I've noticed that hiring is often based on whether you're well-liked rather than on your individual merit, how long you've been at the company, or your experience. This is evident in how some of the leadership seems to lack leadership experience. Finally, the pay is fairly low for what the project requires.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle