employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Ist dies Ihr Unternehmen?

Rewarding work, not so rewarding management - Caseworker bei International Rescue Committee: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
20. Jan. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Making a difference in people lives Connecting immigrants to community resources Possibly of changing client lives.

Kontras

Management's dissatisfaction with an individual may also impact the client’s perception of that person. Additionally, it appears that the policies of the organization are not consistently enforced by those in leadership positions. There is a noticeable lack of organization, absence of established processes, and a deficiency in consistency. Individuals who identify as Hispanic may find themselves in a minority position, which can lead to feelings of marginalization. Furthermore, management may struggle to effectively communicate with clients due to a lack of proficiency in the necessary language. It is important to note that bilingualism is not a requirement for leadership positions within the organization. However a majority of the clue and family’s speak another language.

Mehr Bewertungen zu International Rescue Committee entdecken

5.0
24. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Kontras

None that I can think of.

2.0
22. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Kontras

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle