employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Ist dies Ihr Unternehmen?

Working here was a chaotic, toxic mess - Resettlement Worker bei International Rescue Committee: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
27. Feb. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good benefits and some of the people were wonderful to work with

Kontras

dysfunctional and toxic organizational culture at IRC in Georgia Florida; disengaged executive leadership and management in Atlanta who don't understand the realities on the ground in Tallahassee; IRC's ethics investigations, which are meant to uphold integrity, in practice are used for political maneuvers; senior leadership lacks respect for program staff and their voices; senior leadership's disregard for how organizational dysfunction negatively impacts client outcomes

Mehr Bewertungen zu International Rescue Committee entdecken

5.0
25. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Everyone is so nice here.

Kontras

we have a lot of time to collaborate one project

2.0
22. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Kontras

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle