If you want to join in data annotation work I'll suggest don't if you want peace in your life. - Senior Associate bei Innodata: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
3. Juni 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salary is good along with additional hours and appraisals. If you are in Gen AI project you will feel its heaven where they treat humans as humans giving enough time to learn, make mistakes and make corrections. Each and every lead be it a trainer, be it a team manager, qpe, sme everyone will treat you with care. Your scores will increase automatically when you are in an environment where people give you enough space to grow.

Kontras

If you are in data annotation job then you will feel the hell out there everyday every minute every second. You can't even eat, sleep properly, in the day due to the huge huge workload and in nigh due to stress. They set very very unrealistic targets that even machines are unable to achieve. Your every second has counted, you can take a break coz the work is so hectic and tiring that you can stand up from you seat. Tl will keep you on 9 hr call where you need to share your screen (“perks of WFH"). The tl, tm will call you everyday and give threats on group/1-1 both. Their quality, precision target changes every week and 80% are struggling very very hard to achieve that. Like you forget every thing in your life for that particular work still you can't achieve the target.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Innodata entdecken

5.0
2. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Kontras

Days can get repetitive and dry

2.0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The vast majority of the people I worked with on projects for a major internet company were friendly and educated. The pay was decent for trivial remote work.

Kontras

Projects were tedious at best and seemed poorly designed. Rubrics designed either by the contracting company or Innodata were often poorly thought through, and rules tripped over themselves or remained ambiguous. The company we were sub-contracted to was infamous for not replying to inquiries asking for clarification for how to evaluate the AI. Prompts given to the AI were often incoherent--just a word or name, often misspelled--which left us making arbitrary decisions about how well the AI addressed the prompt. Rubrics were hidden from employees evaluating the AI, though that seemed to be a result of neglect by a company still figuring out how to run things, not an active decision to deceive employees. I left well before the recent waves of layoffs. Management had tried to assure us that jobs were secure, but that seemed delusional given that the contracting company was farming out work through other companies rather than hire us itself.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle