If you want to be valued as a human being, don't work for Innodata - Quality Policy Expert bei Innodata: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
10. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work from home, if you make it to QPE it can be pretty laid back depending on the project

Kontras

Innodata views its employees as numbers on a screen and means to an end. The higher-ups constantly spew lies about the value they place in their employees, but when push came to shove, they notified almost 150 employees of a lay-off after work hours through an attachment on an email. Their standards are near impossible to succeed in as a rater, and if you're elevated to QPE, you'll end up doing the work of others because every person at each position is overworked and expectations are far too high. Regardless of what they say, their loyalty lies only with their clients and their profits, and they will not hesitate to sacrifice the well-being of their employees if it means saving an extra buck. Truly a despicable bunch of greedy, uncaring, and unsavory human beings running the company, so if you end up working there, I truly pity you.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Innodata entdecken

5.0
2. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Kontras

Days can get repetitive and dry

2.0
12. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Some flexibility Work from home

Kontras

One thing I really didn’t enjoy about the guidance: our client sets a bench mark of having 85% “utilization”. Basically stating that of the 40 hours worked, 85% of that must be in “production code”, so about 35ish hours a week. The rest of the time can be spent reviewing emails, guidelines, etc. The project manager basically had management tell people that they could be 2.5 hours in other codes, and about 37.5 should be in production. If this is a decision from a client, then great, but it seemed to me the project manager was just trying to get every little bit of production possible out of people. I’m under the impression that if employees are treated like people and given proper breaks, the quality of work will be way better. If you force them to sit for 7.5 hours or a 8 hour day in front of a screen, the quality will be worse. The client says it’s 85% utilization, so why are we telling our employees they need to be in production for 37.5 hours out of the day? It just seems dishonest. Data annotation work can be tough and some of the tasks are repetitive and can take a lot of concentration. Half of the admin, forgets what it’s like to work in the queues, and drive these numbers blindly. Meanwhile, half of their job consists of chatting on teams all day.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle