It was a good place to learn and be exposed to a variety of projects; however, the company is extremely disorganized. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
7. Jan. 2011
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Not many people in the U.S. so get a lot of recognition for the work you do and exposure to a variety of roles and projects

Kontras

India centric and all decisions are made in Bangalore Horrible systems that you must use internally Horrible policies and connections to business enabler functions Horrible benefits Lack of ability to reward top performers with compensation and promotions

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5.0
22. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexible working, good support for up-skilling.

Kontras

It pays really low as compare to the markets.

4.0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle