Good company - Software Engeenier bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
21. März 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

They are associated with good clients. The projects are very interesting and complex. You will learn a lot here.

Kontras

There is nothing much to socialize with the team membersapart from virtual meet as they are based around the globe.

avatar
Reaktion von Infosys
3y
Thank you for your review of your time at Infosys! We appreciate your honest feedback. Because we strive to provide a great experience to all of our team members, it means so much to us that you enjoyed working with us. We wish you the best!

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5.0
8. Jan. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

good environment, opportunity to learn

Kontras

Bad pay. barely pay to

4.0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle