Clueless management, Competent people - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
27. Mai 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- People. Some of the people I worked with are high calibre intellectuals with no airs about them. - Team bonding and 3rd Fridays

Kontras

- Almost all Partners have their own loyal groups, usually on ethnicity/language lines. You need to have the right mentor in the company - Reverse racism - if you are of south asian descent, it is a huge disadvantage as you are taken for granted. - Some Practice leaders and Partners do not belong at that level. period. Seems the job is a reward for long leal service - Most decisions need to come from Bangalore, so they are taken at a snail's pace - Industry lagging salary. Some years, you don't get any rise at all even if you are top rated

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5.0
8. Jan. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

good environment, opportunity to learn

Kontras

Bad pay. barely pay to

4.0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle