Bureaucracy, lots of bad management, and snail-paced progress up the yin-yang! - Manager bei ISO New England: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
11. Juni 2008
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to be if you want to be a "lifer"--Good pay given the cost of living, good (but deteriorating) benefits, decent work-life balance. You can come in and do your job, stay there for the rest of your life, and if you don't mind never getting promoted, this is the place for you.

Kontras

Quite a bit of incompetent management. Management is VERY risk-averse, even for issues not related to the electric grid. Limited career growth options. Complete lack of strategic direction both at the corporate and department levels. Huge amounts of beaurocracy: a lot of lifers who need the red-tape to keep their jobs. Some VERY bad managers and sr. managers despised by many but they never get removed because of a culture of tolerance for incompetence. There's no competition (for the company or, internally) and that in itself breeds an enviornment where A) it's hard to get ahead and B) there's no way to measure people.

Mehr Bewertungen zu ISO New England entdecken

5.0
20. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Interesting work, very smart coworkers, good pay and benefits

Kontras

Can be slow moving and bureaucratic.

2.0
23. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

If you’re looking for stability, this place truly offers it. Many employees start right out of UMass Amherst and build long careers here. There’s a strong culture of longevity and institutional knowledge, and the organization values predictability and operational continuity. The mission is important and meaningful, and there are many dedicated people who genuinely care about keeping critical systems running. For someone who prefers structure, steady pace, and long-term security, this can be a good fit.

Kontras

The pace of change can be very slow. Decision-making often involves multiple layers of review, which can make even straightforward improvements feel complex. The culture tends to reward consensus-building and process fluency more than technical innovation or speed. If you thrive in fast-moving, highly empowered environments where experimentation and rapid iteration are encouraged, you may find it frustrating. There is significant bureaucracy, and advancement can feel incremental and tenure-based rather than impact-based. Some teams struggle with clarity of ownership and accountability, which can make it difficult to drive change. Hybrid expectations include regular in-office presence in Holyoke.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle