Construction Management - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Fluor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
30. Okt. 2018
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good company with a lot of great people.

Kontras

Good company that doesn't promote it's great people. Lack of accountability for poor performance. Pay ratio for project workers versus project talkers (mostly executives) is gross.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Fluor entdecken

5.0
25. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very transparent, room to grow.

Kontras

can be political, not what you know but who you know.

3.0
6. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good for starting and ending a career in engineering — solid training and plenty of software available. Good benefits and WLB.

Kontras

Most projects are PreFEED, so lots of generic work, and they tend to overhire for these projects. It’s hard to make it to the middle ranks here because of the overhiring and layoff on contract loss cycle. The 980 schedule is actually meant to be a 10-hr day, as they began to emphasize the importance of taking lunch. TOWP and sick days are lumped together and earned on an accrued basis, so vacation days are valuable in the beginning. You can be paid your vacation days at the end, too, when your salary is higher… the consequence is that people come in sick all the time.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle