Pros
Didn't really find any pros
Kontras
Their sample process has you edit at typically subpar levels in order to entice clients, disguising themselves as cheap. As a professional published scientist, it was extremely difficult to do all their lower forms of sample edits (1000 words each) for $3.50 and 80% do not even turn into actual orders, where the pay is also subpar. I spent 4 days editing 'samples' and had to do them over and over because my greeting comment or closing comment wasn't in a 'bubble' and I need to address the client's reference help request, but was chastised that that meant citation formating. After 4 days of BS and a lot of time. I made $10 and had no orders. They said my editing was excellent, but their 'sample process' was apparantly more important. Sorry. I don't work for free.