No innovation,poor management,poor leadership,strict work from office policy - Analytics Scientist bei FICO: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
28. Mai 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Bangalore office space,team outings quarterly.

Kontras

1)Some BU heads are mad behind work from office policy.Not even genuine cases are considered,there are no exceptions in case of medical emergencies even.There is lot of hypocrisy on the other hand there are some people in US who do permanent work from home. 2)Work and power are centralised.Only a handful of people do good work and rest use the products developed by them. 3)No Growth opportunities and everything is IP and work within the company is also not shared.You never get to know what is the algorithm behind the model that you are supposed to do. 4)All good works happens in US.Bangalore office gets patching work and low priority work. 5) Every decision is taken in the context of US scenario.No respect to people in India.

Mehr Bewertungen zu FICO entdecken

5.0
6. März 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salary, work life balance, people

Kontras

Nothing much to say, all good

4.0
24. Jan. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

FICO is a great place to work as a software engineer. I had a very positive experience collaborating with smart, thoughtful teammates on technically interesting problems that have real-world impact at scale. The engineering culture values code quality, thoughtful design, and pragmatic decision-making over hype. Leadership was supportive, expectations were clear, and there was a strong emphasis on ownership and accountability. Overall, it’s an excellent environment for engineers who enjoy working on meaningful systems in a stable, well-run organization.

Kontras

Slower pace of change compared to startups or high-growth tech companies, which can feel restrictive if you prefer rapid experimentation. Legacy systems and tech debt in parts of the organization that require patience and careful refactoring. Process-heavy at times, with multiple reviews or approvals slowing delivery. Less emphasis on cutting-edge frameworks—the focus is more on stability and correctness than chasing the newest tools.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle