Good science & tech people---but kept in a constrained box. - Lead Scientist bei FICO: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
20. Jan. 2009
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

In the technical/scientific side, the intelligence and friendliness of most of the co-workers. Hiring for good personality (lack of aggressive arrogance) and high ability. Willingness to help and share. Few egotistical mainpulators I've come in contact with on my side. Science + tech types who get their job done well.

Kontras

Internal computer support for scientific needs is woefully underdeveloped (hardware and software) far worse than even basic academic labs, much less a Yahoo or Google. Essentially they have no clue and no distinction between some random app-server and hard-core scientific cluster simulation. Continuous downscaling about what IT will support or offer or install, enforced centralization, and of course totally forbidding science or devel to administer their own systems & software installation (i.e. be root). See "advice to senior management".

Mehr Bewertungen zu FICO entdecken

5.0
6. März 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salary, work life balance, people

Kontras

Nothing much to say, all good

4.0
24. Jan. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

FICO is a great place to work as a software engineer. I had a very positive experience collaborating with smart, thoughtful teammates on technically interesting problems that have real-world impact at scale. The engineering culture values code quality, thoughtful design, and pragmatic decision-making over hype. Leadership was supportive, expectations were clear, and there was a strong emphasis on ownership and accountability. Overall, it’s an excellent environment for engineers who enjoy working on meaningful systems in a stable, well-run organization.

Kontras

Slower pace of change compared to startups or high-growth tech companies, which can feel restrictive if you prefer rapid experimentation. Legacy systems and tech debt in parts of the organization that require patience and careful refactoring. Process-heavy at times, with multiple reviews or approvals slowing delivery. Less emphasis on cutting-edge frameworks—the focus is more on stability and correctness than chasing the newest tools.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle