Great place to work, good benefits, average comp - Technical Product Manager bei Expedia Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

5.0
24. Feb. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work-life balance is very good. 40hr weeks are pretty standard, with the occasional longer hours if needed. In the right group/org, the PM role can be highly visible - regularly presenting to CEO, EVPs, etc. Benefits are great, travel discounts are not nearly as good as outsiders might think, but they do exist. Environment is very collaborative - people are always willing to help. They ditched the old review system (ratings, stack-ranking, etc. - all gone). New system in much more geared towards personal growth and open dialog between you and your manager. Management in my current org is receptive to comments/complaints. They genuinely care about their employees, their workload and their careers. Most coworkers are quite intelligent, and the work is challenging and rewarding. Despite my lengthier "Cons" list, I'm pleased with my work here and won't soon be leaving. Compensation would be the only thing that could foreseeably make me leave.

Kontras

Had a bit of a bait-and-switch hiring experience. Interviewed and received an offer for a Sr level position. Verbal offer accepted. Written offer was for lvl 2 - just below Sr. - and about 5k less salary (and 5% less bonus potential), but received signing bonus instead. Started in the core technology group. Position wasn't exactly as I was lead to believe. Was bored within 4 months. Was able to transfer to the engineering org in a much more highly visible role, and have been significantly happier. There is definitely some variance between the different orgs. Organization is very matrix'ed - devs report to dev leads, to dev mgrs, to dev directors. Because of this, there appears to be good career path for engineers. Not so much for PMs, which tend to report to Directors/Sr Directors. There are basically 3 levels of the various PM flavors. Level 2, Sr, and Principle. The only real differences (on paper) are the scale of project and/or products you support. As a PM, a promotion depends on getting that one highly visible project/program to run (this is in addition to your daily responsibilities). If you knock it out of the park near review time, you'll probably get the promotion. Since the org is matrix'ed, PMs don't get direct reports. Almost never. In fact, PMs don't have as much power as I'm used to in previous jobs. If the team you manage doesn't care for a particular decision, they'll just complain up their chain of command. Salary lags behind other local tech leaders. About 5% behind MS for same title, and appears to lag significantly compared to Google, Amazon and others. Though work-life balance can make up for some of the difference. Stock/equity is hard to come by, especially compared to the competition mentioned above. Cash and equity bonuses do happen, but not nearly at the level of AmaGoogleSoft. Merit increases barely keep pace with inflation.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Expedia Group entdecken

5.0
24. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

work life balance lots of pto

Kontras

limited room for growth in the company

2.0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Kontras

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle