Good company, but your mileage may vary - Software Development Engineer bei Expedia Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
10. Nov. 2016
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Lots of company events (celebration for Chinese New Year; anniversary celebration; brought in the Humane Society bus sometimes); good compensation; productive team; QA and code review mean it's hard to ship a bug; my PMs were AMAZING and taught me that PM-ing is actually incredibly useful when done well

Kontras

YMMV--it seems like every team experience is incredibly different. The tech/IT desk is terrible at what they do and pretty transparently sexist. Expect to have to google your problems. For a huge company that on-boards a lot of people regularly, the on-boarding process was ridiculously bad. Documentation isn't up-to-date. Everyone has heard of the problem you're having, but no one remembers how to fix it. Similarly, there are a lot of undocumented code requirements; you end up getting knocked back in code review for requirements that you've never even heard of before.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Expedia Group entdecken

5.0
8. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good leadership and culture, good WLB

Kontras

Large organization means structured, slow moving processes

2.0
29. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Kontras

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle