Horrible Company - Stay Away! - Senior Business Intelligence bei Expedia Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
1. Juli 2016
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I worked there for more than 2 years, and I remember interview part was professional, but that's about the only good thing happened during my 2+ years there.

Kontras

First of all, leadership is of big concern! During the 2+ years there, I have seen like 8 upper management (director or above) folks left just within our department. Whenever superb talents are leaving for other companies, that tells a lot about the culture of this organization. I've talked to bunch of directors, ones left and new ones, and you can tell there's no sense of cohesion and consistent vision within the company. Every director brings their own individual goals without listening to the folks who have worked here for more than 5 years or more to preserve the company culture and benefits of the past. As a result, employees morals are super low and people and ideas are in and out of the door like flying squad. HR does not listen to employees, that's why people leave for better opportunities. Travel perks are limited basically just some occasional discount for hotels, but anyone can find similar rates during hotel website own promotion period.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Expedia Group entdecken

5.0
4. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- good benefits - depending on team great culture

Kontras

Not every team is the same

2.0
29. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Kontras

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle